Skip to main content

Full text of "Unsorted FBI Documents"

See other formats


Attachment to Independent Case Review Report 
For CDRU #513 Case file# 95-279146. 


Material Examiner: Malone fRO) 


Remarks: 

Case resulted in a guilty plea, no testimony transcript. 



INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEW REPORT 


Independent Review conducted by: Steve Robertson 


Area(s) of Expertise: Hair and Fiber 


Review commenced at: 9:45 AM 


(Time), 


10/22/02 


(Date) 


File#: 95-279146 


Laboratory #(s): 70728055 



Exarainer(s) & Symbols 



Reviewed 

Not Reviewed 

Reviewed 

Not Reviewed 

RQ 

X 

□ 

a 

1 □ 

TK UQ 

□ 

X 

□ 

, □ 


□ 

□ 

□ 

□ 


Trial testimony transcript(s) of: 


Testimony Date(s): 


Materials Reviewed 
Not available, pled guilty 


Pages: 


Laboratory Reports): 


Laboratory Number 70728055 

Laboratory Number: 

Laboratory Number: 

Examiner Bench Notes of: RQ and unknown technician 


Laboratory Number: 70728055 


Date: Oct 23, 1987 

Date: 

Date: 


Page 


Initials: 



j 


Was ary other material reviewed? X Yes □ No J 

J 

If yes, please identify and/or describe the material: Submitting agency letter dated July 27, 1987 j 


Results of Review 

File#: 95-279146 Item or Specimen # Reviewed: Q3, K2, K3 


t 

I 


1) Did the examiner perform the appropriate tests in a scientifically acceptable manner, based dn the 
methods, protocols, and analytic techniques available at the time of the original examinatipn(s)? 

□ Yes □ No X Unable to Determine 

2) Are the examination results set forth in the laboratory report(s) supported and adequately documented in 

the bench notes? Q Yes X No O Unable to Determine 

» 

l 

ft 

Revie w of Testimony : 

Note: Numbered comments are required below or on • 

additional pages for any "No" or "Unable to Determine" Responses 


2 

X Transcript not available. 


3) 

Testimony consistent with the laboratory report(s)? 

□ Yes 

□ No 

□ Unable to Determine 

• 

4) 

Testimony consistent with the bench notes? 

□ Yes 

□ No 

□ Unable to Determine 

ft 

5) 

Testimony within bounds of examiner's expertise? 

□ Yes 

□ No 

□ Unable to Determine 




Review of Laboratory Report(s) and Bench Notes: 


Note: Numbered comments are required below or on 
additional pages for any "No” or "Unable to Determine" Responses 


Page 2 of 3 


Initials: 




Comments 

(Set forth by above question #, if applicable. 
Use "Additional Comments" Sheet, if needed) 


File#:- 95-279146 


#1. It cannot be determined from the notes if the tests were performed in a scientifically acceptable manner. 
Please note that the hair comparison was apparently confirmed by a second examiner. 

#2. The results are not adequately documented in the notes. The notes are not dated, are in pencil instead of ink 
and use abbreviations difficult to interpret The length and the number of hair examined is not documented 


Review completed at: 10:00 AM (Time), 10/22/02 (Date) 


Total time spent conducting review (to nearest 1/4 hour): 0.25 hrs. 



I hereby certify that I conducted this review in an independent, unbiased manner and that the results of my review 
are fully documented on this report consisting of a total of 3 pages. 



Oct -22, 202 

r 

(Date) 


Page 


of 


Initials: 




* ~ 

V- 1 




>.